Billy, Hillary, Sin, and America

Two very symbolic Americans -- Billy Graham and Hillary Rodham Clinton -- recently preached very different sermons on the state of nation's soul and what should be done to heal it.

As a rule, politicians receive more media attention than clergy. However, this time Graham was preaching in the U.S. Capitol and he used that pulpit to deliver a sobering call for Americans to repent before it's too late.

Soon, the world "will enter the third millennium," said the elderly evangelist, during May 2 rites in which he and his wife, Ruth, received a Congressional Gold Medal. "Will it be a new era of unprecedented peace and prosperity? Or will it be a continuation of our descent into new depths of crime, oppression, sexual immorality and evil? ... We have confused liberty with license and we are paying the awful price. We are a society poised on the brink of self-destruction."

The first lady's April 24 message to the United Methodist General Conference, meeting in Denver, received less attention. While addressing the same topic -- national renewal -- her message was radically different.

Graham stressed that "America has gone a long way down the wrong road" and now must "turn around and go back and change roads." However, Hillary Clinton argued that Americans must continue to "have courage in the face of change, to be willing to struggle forward doing what we can," seeking unity amid diversity.

"It is easy to complain about the problems that we face," she said. "It is harder -- but far more rewarding -- to roll up our sleeves and work together to solve them."

These were not political speeches, but they offered different answers to a crucial question that looms over national politics in 1996: Is America on the right moral road, or not?

It would be wrong to pin a "Republican" label on Graham's message, or to say that the first lady on this occasion spoke as a Democrat. Still, a kind of party politics was involved. For decades, historians have argued that American Protestantism is a two-party system, with one party emphasizing personal sin and evangelism and the other emphasizing the sins of society and, thus, social activism.

Through the decades, Graham's approach has broadened to include appeals for listeners to carry personal faith into public efforts to fight racism, hunger, poverty and other social problems. Nevertheless, this recent sermon began with the story of his own revival-meeting conversion and stopped just short of offering the assembled politicians, journalists and dignitaries a chance to make public professions of faith in the Capitol Rotunda.

Clinton described her "faith journey" with images familiar to her fellow United Methodists and others raised in oldline flocks, beginning with her christening in an historic sanctuary and continuing through years of church-supported social crusades. She never mentioned "sin" or "repentance." The key, she said, was for people of all religions to cooperate in efforts to help families and strengthen public institutions, schools and social programs.

"We know we need to strengthen the spiritual and moral context of our lives and we know that we need a new sense of caring about one another in which every segment of society, every institution, fulfills it's responsibility to the larger community," she said. "As adults, we have to start thinking and believing that there isn't really any such thing as someone else's child."

Meanwhile, Graham has grave doubts about the ability of "consultations" and "diplomacy" to solve the problems that most plague humanity. A century ago, he noted, optimistic theologians and intellectuals predicted that the "steady march of scientific and social progress" would bring justice and peace. Instead, the 20th century has "been ravaged by ... devastating wars, genocides and tyrannies. During this century we have witnessed the outer limits of human evil."

It is appropriate, said the evangelist, to ask, "Why?"

"The fundamental crisis of our time is a crisis of the spirit," he said. "We have lost sight of the moral and spiritual principles on which this nation was established -- principles drawn largely from the Judeo-Christian tradition as found in the Bible."

Looking For News at the Evangelical Press Association

COLORADO SPRINGS -- This year's national Evangelical Press Association convention theme was "Justice, Mercy and the Power of the Word" and much of the talk centered on hot social issues.

This week's early sessions included questions about racism, AIDS, poverty, abortion, hunger, teen pregnancy, immigration, divorce, drug abuse, gay rights and the tax status of religious groups, to name a few topics. All of this took place amid election-year talk about culture wars and family values, in a city known as a Mecca for today's breed of aggressive Christian activists.

Everybody had an opinion, but there was surprisingly little news to be found. While much has been written about the news media's blind spot on religion, gatherings such as this one offer ample proof that religious media struggle to handle news.

"Year after year, we come together and you can count on one hand the people who are really doing anything with news," said Joel Belz, the association's president and publisher of World, a conservative weekly that mixes news and analysis. "I guess that's just the nature of the beast. ... People don't want to do news."

Between sessions, writers and editors milled around tables covered with magazines, journals and newsletters from many of the association's 300-plus member publications. Most featured glossy photos and chatty, devotional stories about people whose lives have been changed by the ministry of the group that sponsors the publication. The emphasis was on emotion, more than education, and on inspiration, more than information -- even when dealing with complex, controversial issues.

Part of the problem is that most Evangelical Press Association members publish infrequently and have limited resources, said David Neff, Christianity Today's executive editor and the association's president elect. It's hard to "break" news stories in monthly or quarterly publications. Still, many who work in the Christian marketplace have backgrounds in news and it's disappointing that they don't take a more journalistic approach, he said.

"I would hope that these people just wouldn't be able to help themselves and that they'd find themselves doing some form of news just by instinct," said Neff. Also, the lack of news coverage "is intriguing because of the political activism that everyone assumes has taken over evangelicalism. You'd think that we'd be seeing more news-based writing about public issues."

Since the majority of Christian publications are public relations tools, no one expects them to publish hard-edged reports about their leaders. However, editors often go even further and avoid subjects that might require them to make references to competing organizations.

Recently, more Christian leaders have begun viewing their periodicals as part of their marketing efforts, said Ron Wilson, the association's executive director. Not only does this limit news coverage, it may even steer writers and editors away from practical articles about sobering issues linked to faith and ministry.

"The idea is that if your writing blesses people, then they'll turn around a give more to support that ministry; if you make people feel good, then they'll continue to make donations," he said. "Well, this often is interpreted to mean that you shouldn't write about anything that's too serious or has too much information in it. That isn't what people think of as `inspirational.' "

Thus, editors emphasize first-person narratives, devotional meditations and question-and-answer interviews. Also, it's easier and cheaper to produce "mood pieces," rather than well-researched news. On top of that, news tends to make people angry.

The result, said Belz, is that religious groups often keep their members in the dark and, for better or for worse, leave the reporting of hard issues and harsh realities to the secular media.

"The bottom line is that we're not getting the job done," he said. "I also think that it's kind of scary that people who are supposed to be so committed to truth and to the word have so easily accepted a communications model that's based so much on feelings and experiences. Everything's about how people feel. It's getting harder for people to focus on what's true and what's false."

Justice vs. The Worldly Wise

OK, here's where things stand in the war of words between the U.S. Supreme Court justice and the "worldly wise."

According to Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, the elites that rule American intellectual life think that Christians who believe in Easter and other biblical miracles are irrational fools. According to many outraged journalists, politicos and intellectuals, it was irrational and foolish of him to lash out like that at the American people.

"We are fools for Christ's sake," said Scalia, at a prayer breakfast sponsored by the Christian Legal Society chapter at the Mississippi College School of Law. "We must pray for the courage to endure the scorn of the sophisticated world."

Note: Scalia blasted the "sophisticated," "modern" and "worldly wise." Then, the very groups he criticized returned fire by saying that he was attacking America -- period.

The Washington Post reported: "Scalia, a devout Roman Catholic, issued a harsh condemnation of American society, portraying it as not just skeptical of, but openly hostile to religious believers -- particularly Christians."

One of Scalia's most outspoken critics went further. "It's a right-wing litmus test. ... If you don't say religion is being beat up on, then you aren't pitifully correct," the Rev. James Dunn, of the Baptist Joint Committee on Public Affairs, told the Washington Post. "If the American people were as anti-religious as everyone says, then a Supreme Court justice wouldn't have the right to run around saying things like that."

It would help to know more about what Scalia said. However, the justice insisted that his remarks not be taped and his office has not released a text. The Jackson (Miss.) Clarion-Ledger and the Associated Press filed reports and many who were in attendance have been interviewed by journalists.

Obviously, Scalia knew his remarks -- which were laced with sarcasm and irony -- would cause a firestorm, said Phillip E. Johnson, an outspoken Christian who teaches law at the University of California at Berkeley.

"But no one is saying the American people are anti-religious -- especially not Justice Scalia," said Johnson, who began his career as a clerk for U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren. "What he was doing was defending belief in a supernatural God. That's his bottom line."

A Baptist Press report offered another crucial detail. Scalia focused, in part, on 1 Corinthians 1: 18-19: "For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. For it is written, `I will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the cleverness of the clever I will thwart.' "

Today, very little has changed, said Scalia. "The worldly wise just will not have anything to do with miracles. ... To be honest about it, that is the view of Christians taken by modern society. Surely those who adhere to all or most ... traditional Christian beliefs are to be regarded as simple-minded."

Concerning the resurrection, he added: "It is not irrational to accept the testimony of eyewitnesses who had nothing to gain. ... The wise do not believe in the resurrection of the dead. So everything from Easter morning to the Ascension had to be made up by the groveling enthusiasts as part of their plan to get themselves martyred."

Scalia appears to have argued that the "worldly wise" are "naturalists" who reject belief in a supernatural, intelligent, God, said Johnson, author of "Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law & Education." This means that the justice's remarks will anger modernist conservatives who preach social Darwinism, as well as secular liberals.

"This is the big split right now in the Republican's rather shaky coalition -- between the pure economic conservatives and those who stress a moral order," said Johnson. "You see, once you start talking about the God of the Bible, then you're talking about a God who makes moral demands and plays a real role in the real world. ... For many people, it's shocking to hear a Supreme Court justice stand up and say he believes in that kind of God."

Starting Year Nine: Notes and Quotes

Every day, journalists who cover religion face waves of letters, press releases, magazines, books and, now, Internet versions of all of the above.

Some of this is news. Most of it isn't. But many items fall somewhere in between and create drifts of paper in my office. As of this week, I have written this column for eight years and I'd like to start another year by sharing some tidbits I couldn't trash.

* An interesting Newsweek report last summer described an emergency operation that saved a woman's life on a flight out of Hong Kong. The story ended with a dose of foggy faith: "Our lives depend on ... tiny miracles. Physicists say that the universe had to surmount vast odds to exist at all. ... No one stops to think about that, ordinarily, until an event like this one brings it into focus. Thousands of planes take off every day WITHOUT a surgeon on board. But there was a surgeon on Flight 32."

There but by the grace of -- uh -- the universe go we.

* At an Episcopal conference on church growth, New York Bishop Richard Grein criticized those who, to woo the unchurched, may sacrifice "Anglican style." This from a bishop who led a 1993 service in his own cathedral that included a whale-song Sanctus, preaching by skeptic Carl Sagan and prayers to Ra and Ausar.

* A thought for the Rev. Bill Hybels, the superstar pastor of Willowcreek Community Church outside Chicago: Bill Hybels is to Bill Clinton as Billy Graham was to Richard Nixon?

* No joke -- an actual Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) news release began: "The General Assembly Permanent Judicial Commission (PJC) has upheld a decision of the Synod of the Northwest Permanent Judicial Commission, sustaining Long Island Presbytery's decision not to respond to a request from Central Presbyterian Church in Huntington, N.Y., to investigate the alleged ordinations of a homosexual elder and deacon at First Presbyterian Church of Sag Harbor, N.Y." The PJC noted that "dialogue attempted in an atmosphere where one side or the other faces immediate potential remedial or disciplinary actions is not likely to be productive. ... Unprotected dialogue leads inexorably to wholly unproductive monologue."

No translation was offered for the church-lingo impaired. And, please, no jokes about "unprotected dialogue" among Presbyterians.

• The 1994 document "Evangelicals and Catholics Together" angered many on the left, who called it a GOP tract. On the right, some Protestants said it conceded too much to Catholics. Wait until folks see Catholic scholar Peter Kreeft's new book, "Ecumenical Jihad." It urges Christians, Jews and Muslims to unite in fighting the "common enemies" of secularism, materialism and immorality.
• Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz of Lincoln, Neb., has threatened to excommunicate members of 12 groups that reject current church teachings. Question: Will he be excommunicated from the National Conference of Catholic Bishops?
• Here's a memorable politics-and-religion quote from House Democratic Leader Richard Gephardt: "In the Republican version of Christmas, you only get your stocking stuffed if it's a SILK stocking. ... Gone are the notions of decency, charity and compassion that were the hallmarks of the man whose birth we celebrate each December 25th."
• Expect the following to surface in debates about National Public Radio. Referring to Christians who await Jesus' second coming, commentator Andrei Codrescu said: "The evaporation of four million (people) who believe in this crap would leave the world a better place." NPR apologized, after airing the commentary.
• On the Tonight show, Howard Stern waved a Bible and said the Gideons are now putting his books in hotels instead of Bibles. Jay Leno's response: "Howard, ... this (Bible) will strike you down as you go down the road. It will go through the windshield and pierce your heart. I am sounding like an evangelist now. ... Suddenly, all that is in this book is making perfect sense to me."
• Every field has its ruts. New York Times reporter Peter Steinfels said any list of generic religion news stories would include: "Ancient faith struggles to adjust," "Scholars challenge long-standing beliefs," "Interfaith harmony overcomes inherited enmity," "New translation of sacred scripture sounds funny" and "Devoted members of a zealous religious group turn out to be warm, ordinary folk."

TV vs. Traditional Faith

Everyone now and then, people on TV dramas or sitcoms quote scripture, kneel before crosses, mention Jesus by name or perform other acts that symbolize religious devotion.

What happens next is rather predictable, according to the Media Research Center's third annual "Faith In A Box" study of television entertainment and news. A commercial or two later, these true believers usually rob, rape, seduce or shoot someone, or at the very least act like bigots.

"It appears to be OK for characters to say that they have a kind of nebulous faith in some higher power," said Thomas Johnson, who wrote the study's entertainment report. "But the warning sign is when people do something that shows that religion is the most important thing in their lives. That means they're strange ... and they almost always turn out to be intolerant, violent wackos."

In news reports, the Media Research Center is almost always identified as a "conservative media watch group," which means that many media insiders scoff at its findings. However, the "Faith In A Box" reports are getting harder to ignore.

During 1995, the center's researchers studied virtually all prime-time programs -- almost 1,800 hours of content -- on major and minor broadcast networks. The number of portrayals of religion rose slightly to 287, from 253 in 1994. Still, this meant fewer than one depiction for every six hours of programming.

The report noted that negative portrayals of "devout laity and of the clergy" rose sharply, from 35 percent in 1994 to 64 percent in 1995. Positive portrayals of devout laity slid from 44 percent in 1994 to 11 percent in 1995. Twenty percent of 1995 clergy references were positive in, an 8 percent drop in a year.

In other words, while "spirituality" may be making a slight comeback, most Hollywood artists continue to blast religious traditionalists. This is especially true in programs that focus on sex and social issues.

"One of the harshest things you can say about someone in the entertainment business is that they're judgmental. That's a curse," said Johnson. "So when characters say that what they believe is absolutely true, or say that a particular act is sinful, then that means they're judgmental. Obviously, they're bad guys."

The news wasn't much better in network newsrooms. Out of 18,000-plus evening-news reports, religion drew 249. Out of more than 26,000 items in morning-news programs, religion drew 224. "Networks continue to neglect people and issues of faith in their everyday reporting," said the report. "When religion is covered, hostility toward traditional religious positions on social issues remains overt and sometimes unrebutted."

In one case study, "60 Minutes" superstar Mike Wallace devoted an entire segment to Call to Action, a Catholic group that opposes church teachings on birth control, the ordination of women, priestly celibacy, abortion and other social issues. The report featured 25 Call to Action sound bites, without including a single traditional Catholic voice. Later, Wallace told the Catholic newspaper Our Sunday Visitor that quotations from conservative Catholics just didn't blend with Call To Action footage.

As in Hollywood, social issues cause problems. Washington Post reporter Howard Kurtz, appearing on conservative Cal Thomas' CNBC talk show, conceded that a "cultural bias" exists on subjects such as religion, abortion and homosexuality. "I think a lot of it is unconscious, but I think on those kinds of subjects, most reporters are probably to the left of the American public," he said.

Media Research Center analysts did find some signs of improvement, especially at ABC News, the only network newsroom with a religion specialist. Also, the faith-friendly CBS drama "Touched By An Angel" is drawing a loyal audience. Acknowledging that religion plays a positive role in millions of lives might be a savvy move in an era when complaints are up and ratings down.

Nevertheless, "old habits don't change easily," the report concluded. "The silver lining ... is that the failure of the broadcast networks' yuppie-centered fall offerings and the continued decline in their share of the audience makes a return to traditional programming a more attractive prospect now."

Jewish Life, Passover, and Pop Culture

The premiere issue of Jewish Family & Life includes a recipe for Matzah Brei.

You need six eggs, beaten, two cups of half and half, four matzahs and four tablespoons of vegetable oil. The rest is simple: soak the broken matzahs in the milk and cream for two minutes, then remove and soak in the eggs. Fry the results until golden and you have what amounts to Jewish french toast.

This is rather standard fare for a Jewish publication during Passover, which began Tuesday at sundown. However, this isn't just any Matzah Brei -- it's Steven Spielberg's recipe.

"We're not going to turn this into the Jewish version of People or something," said editor-in-chief Yosef Abramowitz. "But face it, most Jewish magazines are boring. ... Our younger readers know who Stephen Spielberg is. While they're reading about his Jewish life we can pull them in and start talking about their Jewish lives."

That sounds simple. However, this is the 1990s and both Abramowitz and publisher Susan Laden know it will take skill to publish a breezy magazine called Jewish Family & Life! amid raging debates over the very definitions of words such as "Jewish" and "family." Thus, their advisory board includes well-known Jewish names from across the theological spectrum.

"What we care about is rejuvenating homes and helping them become Jewish homes," said Abramowitz. "It isn't in our interest to try to define Judaism for our readers and to say what is and what isn't a family. We're interested in promoting Jewish life, not Jewish arguments. ... We'll be working with everybody except Jews for Jesus."

One statistic looms in the background. As the '90s began, the intermarriage rate between Jews and non-Jews stood at 57 percent, up from 40 percent in 1980, and those who intermarry are much less likely to raise their children as Jews.

It's impossible to avoid the intermarriage issue, said Laden. However, the magazine will try to focus on how this affects homes, not Jewish institutions. The goal will be to help parents learn to say bed-time prayers, handle grandparents who celebrate Christmas or advise a teen who wants to date a non-Jew.

"We want to talk about the spirituality of daily life, the kind of issues that come up when children start asking real questions and parents try to answer them," said Laden. "I think young families are searching. They don't know where to find help. ... So we'll start at that point, instead of trying to impose some kind of rigid structure from on high."

The magazine's target audience consists of parents between the ages of 25 and 49. Surveys indicate that readers in an initial controlled circulation of 200,000 are "an advertiser's dream," said Laden. Ninety percent have college degrees and 90 percent own computers. (Yes, the magazine has an Internet address: JFLeditors@aol.com.) The average household income is $112,000.

Starting next fall, the quarterly magazine will offer a few longer reports about some events and trends. However, Israeli court decisions don't have as much impact in urban homes as new World Wide Web sites offering Jewish computer games, said Abramowitz.

"We're not going to apologize for our approach," he said. "We accept that mass media and popular culture are a powerful part of life and it wouldn't make sense to ignore that. That's just the way it is. ... So we may offend a few people, from time to time, but we know this is going to get the attention of younger readers."

For example, the first issue's "LIFE!Cycles" column included a chatty item about Roseanne Barr Arnold Thomas' new baby, Buck. Since he is the product of in vitro fertilization, the editors modestly suggested that he be given the Hebrew name "Binyamin," or "son of my right hand." After the issue came out, the staff heard from Roseanne's rabbi in Brentwood, Calif. Sure enough, the baby had already been given that very Hebrew name.

"What can I say? Warped minds think alike," said Abramowitz. "We must be on the cutting edge."

Leighton Ford and the 'Evangelism' Debates

SEATTLE -- Outside the Golf Park club house, rows of men are hitting practice balls into the Northwest's chilly morning mists.

Inside, the Rev. Leighton Ford is warming up, too. After nearly 50 years as an evangelist, the longtime leader in the Lausanne Committee on World Evangelization keeps seeking the right set of images to reach new listeners.

On this day, that means digging into what he calls "a rather New Agey" novel called "The Legend of Bagger Vance: Golf and the Game of Life." Instead of a stadium crowd, Ford is facing a pack of golfers invited by people in a local church.

"All sport is holy. ... But golf is supreme," says Ford, reading. "The golfer ... comes to realize that the game is not against the foe, but against himself. His little self. That yammering, fearful, ever-resistant self that freezes, chokes, tops, nobbles, shanks, skulls, duffs, flubs. This is the self we must defeat."

Ford shrugs, an editorial comment that this is fascinating, but not the whole story. "Well," he says, after a long pause, "that's a good place to start."

It was back in 1949 when Ford, a lanky Canadian teen-ager, first met a young evangelist named Billy Graham. A few years later, Ford met and married another Wheaton (Ill.) College student -- Graham's sister, Jean. After years as a Graham associate, Ford eventually began his own global ministry based in Charlotte, N.C., training young church leaders. During a recent week in the Seattle area, the Presbyterian preacher worked with evangelists who speak in settings from Moscow to Australia, from a woman in suburban Florida to a man from the Dakotas' High Plains.

"Most people say, `I know evangelism is something I'm supposed to do, but, to tell you the truth I don't do it very often,'" says Ford. "They'll say they're scared to do it, or that they don't know how to do it. ... It's like the old joke: What do you get when you cross a Jehovah's Witness with a Presbyterian? Someone who knocks on doors, but they don't know what to say."

Some churches, Ford explains, try to reduce evangelism to social work or outreach, while others assume they can save souls without addressing the often painful realities of daily life.

In the post-war era, Graham and others built parachurch groups that reached the GIs and their children in growing suburbs. Others stressed one-on-one work. "For many, the key word `saved' meant an introduction to the Christ of the American way, who wore a gray-flannel suit," said Ford, in a late 1980s address.

Soon, some turned to small groups and "relational" evangelism, especially on campuses, while others tapped into '60s debates about justice and racism. The '70s "Jesus Movement" made headlines emphasizing a Jesus with long hair and sandals. Next came megachurches and charismatic groups that specialized in reaching others who felt uncomfortable in traditional churches. In the '80s, many conservatives focused on politics -- as mainliners did in the '60s -- in some cases leading to a "backlash which created fear ... and made evangelism more difficult," said Ford.

Through it all, researchers found that the vast majority of those who make religious decisions are brought to gatherings by friends or acquaintances. Trends come and go, but the key remains the same: friends talking to friends about their faith, forming webs of trust.

Still, there is more to this mystery than friendly people shaking hands, or church committees that deliver fresh bread and cookies. At some point, truly evangelistic churches challenge people to make decisions that affect this life and eternity. Words such as "sin" and "repentance" must be spoken, especially in an age of broken homes and wounded spirits, says Ford.

"This is why some people remain scared to even talk about evangelism. In many mainline churches, you can go decades without hearing anyone talk about conversion. ... You have a silence there that has lasted for a generation or more. That's the worst of all possible options. Silence never works."

Regent and the Politics of Entertainment

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. -- Anyone seeking Middle America's true marketplace of ideas need only click on a television.

Thus, one political cartoonist summed up the '92 White House race by having a husband study the TV listings and then tell his wife: "We can watch Clinton on MTV, Bush on `Letterman,' Perot on `Arsenio' ... or Madonna on `Meet the Press.'"

That's entertainment and, today, that's politics. Many of America's hottest debates about morality and public life are staged in sitcoms, movies, music videos and talk shows. Reaching the masses means finding niches in pop culture.

Ponder this question: How should strategists at the Christian Coalition respond if President Clinton shows up on "Friends"?

It could happen. Meanwhile, this is precisely the kind of laugh-to-keep-from-crying question that film scholar Terry Lindvall keeps asking at Regent University, a graduate school founded in 1978 by religious broadcaster Pat Robertson.

Obviously, millions of religious conservatives have shed decades of inhibitions and waded into politics, said Lindvall. However, many continue to have trouble acknowledging the major role that mass media and entertainment play in American life.

"It's all about telling a story, isn't it? ... You have to capture people's imaginations," said Lindvall, who, to the shock of many, was named Regent's president in 1993. "When you shape someone's imagination, you eventually shape their actions. That's the power of media and the arts -- they seduce imaginations. ... No one has ever won a debate that really matters through an argument. Arguments only polarize people and make them hang on to what they already believe."

In the months ahead, President Clinton and Sen. Bob Dole will spend millions trying to tell their stories. Dole's is a story of war, sacrifice, courage and service. This will be a tough sell, because so few Americans identify with this story and because Dole isn't a good storyteller. Meanwhile, Bill and Hillary Clinton have become the Jim and Tammy Bakker of American politics.

"The president's story may be a soap opera, but, hey, at least people are watching," said Lindvall. "The problem for Dole is that many people are simply going to turn him off. End of story."

This tension between politics and entertainment, between the systems of government and the symbols of mass media, is very much in evidence at Regent, a stately, neocolonial campus that critics and supporters alike often call the "Harvard of the Religious Right." It would be impossible, with Robertson as chancellor, to hide the ties that bind the school to the Christian Coalition and to the conservative powers that be in Washington, D.C.

Yes, students from Regent's school of government help draft legislation and work on congressional staffs and campaign teams, said Lindvall. But it's also important that Regent graduates are working on projects for HBO and PBS, for Disney and Fox.

"You have to do both, today. ... Of course, it says a lot that most people around here feel more comfortable talking about working in the government than they do working in the media," he said. "Most Christians have always considered the arts and entertainment to be out there on the edge. It's the artists who want to color outside the lines and break the rules."

Thus, most conservative attempts to compete in the media marketplace produce what Lindvall called "happy little Christian films" that bore most Americans -- including believers. Others cling to the belief that they can cause sweeping moral changes by winning a few elections or creating a few evangelical films or television shows. If only things were that simple.

"Laws will not change people's hearts when you're talking about issues like abortion. Now, I'm not saying that laws aren't important. I am saying that even more important changes have to occur elsewhere," he said. "Laws can't change the fact that people's imaginations have been shaped by millions of images and stories. ... We have to create new images that will haunt people and seduce their imaginations. We have to tell some new stories."

Oprah, 'Babe' and Religious Liberty

It's hard to debate religious liberty issues with a superstar pig from Hollywood.

The star of "Babe, the Gallant Pig" made a cameo appearance during the recent taping of an Oprah Winfrey show about Bible readings and prayers in public schools in Pontotoc, Miss. The talking pig -- on video -- interrupted the host's opening narration about "people who have been made to feel like outcasts in their own communities."

While plugging the movie, "Babe" stressed its timely message -- the importance of loving one another and having an "unprejudiced heart." Sure enough, this sound bite later fit perfectly in yet another television drama about the Religious Right. The episode is scheduled to air Tuesday, March 19.

"There's really not much you can do," said Michael Whitehead, a Southern Baptist attorney representing the school district. "You can either play their game and look like a cad or be silent and not defend yourself. ... If you choose to take them on, then it's really hard not to appear angry. After all, the whole game is set up to produce fireworks."

In this case, the local school board allowed student-led prayers and Bible readings, resulting in a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union and People For The American Way. In addition to attorneys, the "Oprah" show featured citizens who back the school board as well as those who contacted the ACLU, Lisa Herdahl and her son, Kevin.

Beforehand, Whitehead said that Winfrey's staff seemed surprised that many in the studio audience supported voluntary prayer. Thus, they hunted for those willing to take the other side in a "spontaneous" debate.

Producers have to find out who will do the best job of stating strong opinions on the air, said Jill Almquist, an "Oprah" publicist. Also, it's customary to move these people to designated chairs, to help the camera crews. "We do ask, `Who can we go to?'... But we don't like people to do too much talking ... because we want to save the excitement for the show itself," she said.

From Whitehead's perspective it appeared that the producer, after generating "passionate and heated exchanges," then set out to tape a show about "how awful it is that people in Pontotoc have ... strong, passionate convictions." Also, Winfrey's script suggested that Christian activists engaged in, or condoned, alleged death threats and harassment.

"People are seeing images of students praying around a flag pole or holding a rally," said Whitehead. "But Oprah's doing a voice-over that says something like, `How would it feel to get up in the morning not knowing if this day would be your last or to wonder if you'll be shot on the way to the supermarket?' "

Ironically, recent research -- including work by conservatives -- indicates that "Oprah" is now one of talk TV's least sensationalistic shows. Also, Winfrey openly embraces religion. While her beliefs may be unorthodox, and her personal life is tabloid territory, she often goes out of her way to use language such as "the God that I love loves all of us, no matter what" or to say that she is a practicing Christian.

"The studio audience always ends up applauding as Oprah defends Christianity," said Whitehead, who was making his second appearance on Winfrey's show. "She's the champion of a loving Christianity and, obviously, anyone who takes a different approach represents a mean, judgmental Christianity."

The result is a powerful form of television that addresses serious public issues, while emphasizing entertainment, opinion and, above all, visual images. While it's hard to know what editors will choose as a finale for this show, Whitehead predicted it will be an emotional statement by Kevin Herdahl, followed by Winfrey's reprise of the gospel according to "Babe."

"It's a classic. You have a teen-ager saying `Can't we all just get along?', with tears running down his cheeks," he said. "You can't argue with a teen-ager's tears. So much for student-initiated, student-led prayers and Bible studies. So much for a fair debate. ... It all comes down to tears and a Hollywood pig."