But there was a twist. This time it was HBO’s Bill Maher — sermonizing against religion has become his life’s work — who claimed that Obama is hiding a deep, dark secret. During the Feb. 11 episode of his “Real Time” talk show, Maher said he knows an unbeliever when he sees one and that Obama is probably an agnostic.

This came a week after the president made another attempt, as church people say, to give “his testimony.” Yes, his mother was a skeptic, Obama said, during the National Prayer Breakfast, but she was also “one of the most spiritual people that I ever knew.” Her values led him to the Civil Rights Movement and to the Baptist, Catholic and Jewish clergy who led it.

“Their call to fix what was broken in our world, a call rooted in faith, is what led me … to sign up as a community organizer for a group of churches on the Southside of Chicago,” he said. “And it was through that experience working with pastors and laypeople trying to heal the wounds of hurting neighborhoods that I came to know Jesus Christ for myself and embrace Him as my lord and savior.”

The presidency has, on occasion, driven him to his knees, he said. But faith has strengthened his family, especially “when Michelle and I hear our faith questioned from time to time.”

Those old questions remain a concern months after a Pew Research Center poll found that 18 percent of Americans think Obama is a Muslim. At that time, only 34 percent of those polled said the president is a Christian and 43 percent said they didn’t know his current religion. Among strong supporters, 43 percent of blacks and 46 percent of Democrats agreed that he is a Christian.

The bottom line: Millions of voters remain unsure whether Obama is their kind of believer.

Maher’s attack was unique, since it came from an outspoken liberal, the acidic wit behind the movie “Religulous,” an fierce secularist who is so turned off by faith that he calls himself an “apatheist” instead of an atheist. If Maher has a sanctuary, it’s the Playboy mansion.

“With friends like Mr. Maher, Mr. Obama doesn’t need enemies,” noted Brent Decker, who leads The Washington Times editorial page.

Maher stated his doubts during a roundtable about whether the president is sincere in his attempts to march under a “centrist” banner. The iconoclastic comedian agreed with many religious conservatives on one crucial fact — that Obama often appears to hide his true beliefs.

“If you woke him up in the middle of the night, or if you gave him sodium pentothal, I think he’s a centrist the way he is a Christian — not really,” said Maher. In other words, Obama is pretending to be a centrist and a Christian.

The African-American philosopher and critic Cornel West disagreed: “He is a Christian, he’s just a centrist Christian. He’s not a prophetic Christian.”

Maher stood firm: “His mother was a secular humanist and I think he is too.”

This unleashed a lightning-fast series of exchanges, with guests discussing the fact that Obama entered the black church before he entered national politics. As an adult, he had already begun a spiritual journey that took him away from his mother’s blend of skepticism and spirituality.

“He changed his mind on the God question, brother Bill,” West reminded the host. “He changed his mind on the God question.”

Again, Maher insisted that Obama is hiding his true beliefs in the same way that he keeps insisting that he continues to “struggle with gay marriage.” It’s smart politics for Obama to say one thing while believing the other, said Maher.

Nevertheless, insisted West, “Being a Christian is not a political orientation for the president. He is a Christian.”

“I just don’t believe him,” Maher said.

“Bill, what do you think he is?”, asked West. “You think he’s agnostic, actually?”

“Yeah, kind of,” said Maher.

West grew even more animated, asking, “On what grounds do you say that? … What kind of evidence you got?”

Maher declined to answer and steered the discussion into safer territory.

Getting in the last word, West noted: “But somebody is wrong about this thing.”

For the few who didn’t catch it online, the ad features a worried pastor — in a clerical collar — who has empty pews and too many unpaid bills. Thus, he prays for inspiration and God responds with the sound of crunching chips and fizzing soda.

Soon hungry souls — Jewish, Amish and Hare Krishna included — are lining up in church for Doritos and Pepsi MAX in a way that suggests Holy Communion.

The brands are no surprise, since Media Wave Productions of Philadelphia produced “Feed Your Flock” for PepsiCo’s annual “Crash the Super Bowl” contest, in which flocks of folks hope to win $1 million if their creation finishes No. 1 in USA Today’s Ad Meter rankings. The chips-and-soda communion entry didn’t qualify for a Super Bowl airing and has since vanished from YouTube and other sites after waves of protests by Catholics and others.

“It’s hard to imagine such an ad being created only a few decades ago,” noted Shane Rosenthal of the White Horse Inn weblog. “The trivialization of the sacred in this piece is nothing less than astounding. And that’s just it. There isn’t anything sacred anymore. Everything’s a joke.”

This offering, however, wasn’t the only attempt at a Super Bowl ad built on religion or politics or both. Controversies of this kind have increased in recent years, with video activists on the cultural right and left doing their share of poking and protesting.

If professional football has become a form of religion, then it isn’t surprising that America’s Christmas Wars over faith in the public square are now followed by Super Bowl Culture Wars in the marketplace.

This year, “Feed Your Flock” wasn’t even the only “Crash the Super Bowl” entry that used a dash of sacrilege. In “Party Crashers,” another entry now on YouTube, God and Jesus make a scene at a party by eating all the Doritos. They are asked to leave and, with a snap, Jesus miraculously refills the empty snack bag. “Let’s go, Dad,” he says.

Several other ads rejected by the Fox Sports Media Group this year featured religious and political content that was too hot to be allowed into the Super Bowl ad wars with the heavyweights like Bud Light, GoDaddy.com and Snickers.

* In one, two curious football fans turn to the Bible after spotting “John 3:16” written in the black patches under a star player’s eyes. The network said the Fixed Point Foundation video contained too much “religious doctrine.”

* Self-proclaimed “conservative comedian” Richard Belfry also failed in an attempt to air a commercial for his “Jesus Hates Obama” online store that sells T-shirts and other items with his trademark slogan. Belfry said a circle of private investors agreed to purchase a 30-second Super Bowl slot — which usually sell for about $3 million.

* Anti-abortion activist Randall Terry is attempting a novel approach, going so far as to register as a Democratic Party candidate for the White House so that he could insist that networks air his graphic video because of a campaign advertising loophole in existing FCC regulations. Few other opponents of abortion have taken his side.

This is not a new story. Before the 2009 Super Bowl, CatholicVoter.com failed in an attempt to air “Imagine,” an ad featuring a sonogram video of an unborn child matched with text offering thanks that the difficult family circumstances surrounding the young Barack Obama did not prevent his birth. Last year, Focus on the Family was successful with “Celebrate Family, Celebrate Life,” an ad focused on missionary Pam Tebow and her decision to endure a risky pregnancy before giving birth to Tim, the future Heisman Trophy-winning quarterback.

These media conflicts are not connected with the tough Constitutional issues that drive the church-state conflicts that have become so common in recent decades, noted J. Brent Walker, head of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty. Nevertheless, these faith-based controversies about Super Bowl advertisements — whether silly, satirical or dead serious — seem to be stirring similar public emotions.

“If we lived in a culture in which no one cared much about religion,” he said, “then people wouldn’t get so passionate about these things. But that wouldn’t be America, would it?”

And behold, two postmodern prophets witnessed this media storm and decided that it was good. In response, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert of Comedy Central organized their pre-election “Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear.”

Colbert, a progressive Catholic Sunday school teacher who pretends to be a right-wing blowhard, provided the fake “fear” factor. In his upside-down catechism, preaching “fear” became the same thing as advocating that nonpartisan virtue — “hope.”

The prophet of sanity was Jon Stewart. With his snarky call for rationality and civility, the Daily Show anchor implied that his critics were preaching insanity, irrationality and incivility. And, for once, he didn’t season his satire with ironic shots at his own Jewish roots.

Truth is, Stewart has become a hero for many Jews and a controversial figure for others, noted Jane Eisner, editor of The Jewish Daily Forward. Nevertheless, Stewart — originally Jon Stewart Leibowitz — has once again been named to the “Forward 50,” the newspaper’s list of those who made a “significant impact on the Jewish story in the past year.”

“This is very impressionistic,” she said. “We try to identify people who are acting in ways that impact the Jewish community. … We are looking for people who are acting in ways that really show the impact of their Jewish values, whether we’re talking about Judaism as a faith or a culture.”

However, many Jews have “real questions about how Jewishly Stewart acts.” Nevertheless, said Eisner, “if we can translate this into Jewish terms, he keeps showing us that he knows his stuff, even as he makes fun of the fine details of Jewish life.”

As his Forward 50 mini-biography notes: “A Democrat in the White House has hardly tempered the irreverent and distinctly Jewish voice of the liberal-leaning fake news anchor. … Stewart is quick to play the Jewish card, drop a Zabar’s reference or cozy up to bubbes and zaydes at the 92nd Street Y.”

That’s one side of this identity question. However, the Hollywood Jew weblog noted: “For some Jews it’s perplexing that Jon Stewart, an American Jewish icon, isn’t religious. How could the Jew who makes Jewish ‘cool’ be so indifferent to Judaism? … Buried beneath the laughter from his jokes … is a deep and hidden disappointment that he isn’t really doing what we’re doing.” This is, after all, a man who flaunts his bacon-cheeseburgers on Yom Kippur, the holiest day on the Jewish calendar.

Nevertheless, with his edgy sermons about skepticism and reason, Stewart dwells comfortably with other Jewish progressives who see themselves as heirs of the Enlightenment — standing against blind faith and ancient traditions. The assumption for many on the Jewish left, said Eisner, is that there is always “something worrisome about people who take their faith really seriously.”

These religious tensions were visible on the National Mall during the Stewart-Colbert rally. While organizers insisted their event was non-partisan, and pled with participants to temper their words and deeds, the crowd included flocks of people who clearly were there to mock the views of religious and secular conservatives.

Consider, for example, the inevitable Hitler signs.

When announcing his rally, Stewart said he planned to distribute signs that were both civil and witty. One sign, for example, would say: “I Disagree With You, But I’m Pretty Sure You’re Not Hitler.”

Many got the message, but some didn’t. Someone produced signs containing images of prominent conservatives — with Hitler mustaches — and the headline, “Afraid yet?” Beck, Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh made the sign, along with Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, almost certainly the next Speaker of the House, and Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, the likely House majority leader.

Cantor is Jewish and, like Stewart, made the Forward 50 list for 2010.

Stewart remained silent. Still, as his rally ended, the funny man soberly admitted that he could not control “what people think this was.”

“I can only tell you my intentions,” he said. “This was not a rally to ridicule people of faith, or people of activism, or to look down our noses at the heartland, or passionate argument, or to suggest that times are not difficult, and that we have nothing to fear. They are, and we do.

“But we live now in hard times — not the end times.”

So it was a solemn occasion when the great preacher from Dallas arrived in “Jerusalem on the Brazos” in 1941 to preach a series of revival services at Baylor University, the planet’s largest Baptist institution of higher learning. Then loud alarm clocks started ringing in the attic of cavernous Waco Hall, on three-minute intervals.

This pandemonium was, of course, orchestrated by Baylor’s Nose Brotherhood. This club for satirists was born in 1926 and quickly became known for its “Pink Tea” spectaculars, which offered “vertical exercising” on a campus that, from 1845-1996, banned dancing. The secret society was “just a fun-loving bunch of boys,” Brother Dude Nose Harrison told the Dallas Morning News in 1931.

The Nose became the NoZe in 1965 when, in an event that has achieved mythic status, a campus bridge that once a year was ceremonially painted pink mysteriously went up in flames. The brothers were temporarily banished, but began appearing in their signature glasses, fake noses and tacky wigs.

The question now facing America is whether the activities of the NoZe Brotherhood could cost the Republican Party control of the U.S. Senate.

Alas, this is not satire.

Kentucky Democrat Jack Conway has asked why Republican Rand Paul, in the ominous words of a television advertisement, was a “member of a secret society that called the Holy Bible a ‘hoax,’ that was banned for mocking Christianity and Christ? Why did Rand Paul once tie a woman up, tell her to bow down before a false idol and say his god was ‘Aqua Buddha’?”

Being accused of “anti-Christian” activities is not a good thing in the Bible Belt. As the Washington Post put it, Paul stands accused of participating in a “secret society while at Baylor University that published mocking statements regarding the Bible.”

The Conway campaign added: “This is an ad about things he did. He has failed to deny any of these charges.”

At this point, I should stress that while I am a Baylor graduate from the same era as Paul, I am not, nor have I ever been, a member of the NoZe Brotherhood. I did know some NoZe folks, including one who became a White House speechwriter, and like all Baylor alumni I know that no non-NoZe knows the no-nonsense non-NoZe news that the NoZe knows.

The Republican has acknowledged participating in NoZe pranks. Meanwhile, one of his Baylor colleagues told the Louisville Courier-Journal: “We aspired to blasphemy and he flourished in it.”

Sounds like the NoZe to me.

During my years at Baylor, the secret society mocked all kinds of people, including Dan Rather, Richard Nixon, Watergate special prosecutor Leon Jaworski (a powerful Baylor alum) and Bob Woodward of the Washington Post. I was present when Woodward was made an honorary member — Brother Water NoZe, or some variation on that theme. As I recall, the NoZe crashed his campus lecture, presenting him with his own plunger, while seated on a rolling commode.

The NoZe mocked all things Baptist, targeting the many sacred cows that resided on campus. These NoZe drippings rarely achieved brilliance and often veered into college-life stupidity.

Nevertheless, the Baylor Library maintains a modest NoZe archive. While the brotherhood has been exiled from campus several times, its official historian — the late Brother Short Nose (William B.) Long — served on the Baylor board of regents and received his alma mater’s highest honor, The Founders Medal.

Drawing on this respected physician’s book, “The Nose Brotherhood Knows: A Collection of Nothings and Non-Happenings, 1926-1965,” Baylor Magazine published a 2003 report that probed the philosophy behind the brotherhood’s attempts to “put the ‘pie’ in piety” and “the ‘pun’ in punctilious.”

The bottom line: It is, as a rule, quite dangerous to mix satire and religion.

One of the NoZe — it may have been Brother Bilbo BaggiNoze or Brother IgNoZetius Reilly — told the magazine: “I have no problems whatsoever with Christianity, but I think blind Christianity is a mistake. People are sometimes afraid to examine other religions, but it just makes your beliefs stronger in the end. I don’t think a Christian mission means that we can’t look at and study everything in the world. Furthermore, if education is really the goal of each student here … certainly they’d want to be exposed to as many opinions and as many things as possible.”

After all, one of the main characters in his syndicated comic strip “Kudzu” was the Rev. Will B. Dunn, a deep-fried Southern preacher who always remained optimistic, even as he battled with the insanity of modern life (especially trendy Bible translations).

Meanwhile, Marlette’s political cartoons often inspired readers to barrage editors with the kind of God talk that cannot be printed in family newspapers.

There was, for example, his caricature of Pope John Paul II wearing a “No Women Priests” button. The caption said, “Upon this Rock I will build my church” and Marlette drew an arrow pointing at the pope’s head. Another infamous cartoon showed an Arab terrorist driving a truck containing a nuclear bomb. The caption: “What Would Mohammed Drive?”

A cartoon on my office wall — a gift from Marlette as I left the Charlotte Observer — shows PTL televangelist Jim Bakker kneeling before a dollar sign that towers over a stone altar framed with candles. Bakker proclaims, with his boyish grin, “Gimme that old time religion!”

The cartoonist knew he was playing with holy fire. You can’t draw Jesus climbing Calvary on Good Friday — carrying an electric chair — and not expect people to react.

Marlette insisted that his goal was to remind his fellow believers to practice what they preach.

“As I look back through my work, I’m always amazed by how much of what I do just comes out of having gone to Sunday school,” he said, taking a break in his cluttered Observer office in the mid-1980s. “The perspective, the viewpoint, comes out of that. They don’t teach subversive ideas in the Magnolia Street Baptist Church in Laurel, Mississippi.”

Marlette, 57, was back in Mississippi recently when he died in a single-vehicle crash on a rain-swept highway while on the way to help a high school perform his musical, “Kudzu.” A true gadfly, he rattled cages for more than three decades and died with more than his share of faithful friends and fierce critics.

A native of North Carolina, the cartoonist and writer burst into print after studying at Florida State University, where he tried to study art but ended up majoring in philosophy. He took classes in New Testament and ethics but also, as he loved to note, classes in sports officiating. Marlette won a Pulitzer Prize in 1988 for his work at the Observer and the Atlanta Constitution. He wrote two novels and, in 2001, became a distinguished visiting professor of journalism at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Marlette had a better grasp of the power of religion than most journalists, noted former Observer editor Rich Oppel, who led the newsroom during the PTL era. The cartoonist was a provocateur and, at his best, a prophet.

“After 10 years of our reporting, televangelist Bakker resigned from PTL and was later convicted of fraud and sentenced to federal prison,” noted Oppel, in his editor’s column at the Austin American-Statesman. “Bakker’s handpicked successor was Jerry Falwell, who came in to see me and ‘make peace.’

“From a corner, Marlette cast a gimlet eye on Falwell as the minister did his best Sunday school number on me. Marlette then retreated to his lair to pen a cartoon of the preacher as a serpent in the Garden of Eden. Falwell refused to talk to me again.”

When it came to religion, Marlette thought of himself as a Baptist’s Baptist, a fierce believer in the “priesthood of the believer,” the authority of human experience and the separation of church and state.

There are, he told me, people who become cynical about religion and he was determined not to yield to that temptation — very often. But there were many times when he preferred laughing, instead of crying.

While he took the Christian faith seriously, he also thought it was futile to obsess over details. There were times when he felt like a church of one.

“It’s my own church, my own perspective. It certainly doesn’t deserve to be institutionalized or taken more seriously than other people’s,” said Marlette. “It’s not infallible. It’s skewed. It’s mine. … It’s kind of like dissecting a frog. Once you get the thing cut up and taken apart, it’s not really a frog anymore. Something dies in the process.”

Consider what happened recently after a staged emergency at Burlington Township High School in New Jersey. The police script for the drill called for armed men to crash the front doors, shoot several students and barricade themselves in the library with hostages. This document, according to the Burlington County Times, described the intruders as part of “a right-wing fundamentalist group called the ‘New Crusaders’ who do not believe in the separation of church and state.” The two gunmen attacked because a child had been expelled for praying.

For some reason, evangelical pastors became alarmed. Thus, local officials and educators released a statement saying they regretted “any insensitivity that might have been inferred” by this scenario, including any offense taken by those who “inferred” that the mock terrorists were Christians.

I have no idea why pastors “inferred” that organizers of this tax-funded drill had in any way suggested that “right-wing” fundamentalists in a “New Crusaders” army opposed to the “separation of church and state” and angry about a “school prayer” dispute might be conservative Christians.

No way. Why would anyone “infer” something like that?

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Boredom is rarely a problem for journalists on the religion beat. That’s why I mark this column’s anniversary every year — this is No. 18 — by offering a grab-bag collection of strange stories that I didn’t have the chutzpah or the time to cover during the previous 12 months. So hang on.

* During holiday seasons, I get all kinds of email and often it’s hard to tell when people are joking. For example, I received an copy of “The Two-Minute Haggadah: A Passover service for the impatient.” It condensed the rite’s pivotal four questions to this:

(1) “What’s up with the matzoh?” (2) “What’s the deal with horseradish?” (3) “What’s with the dipping of the herbs?” (4) “What’s this whole slouching at the table business?” The answers? “(1) “When we left Egypt, we were in a hurry. There was no time for making decent bread.” (2) “Life was bitter, like horseradish.” (3) “It’s called symbolism.” (4) “Free people get to slouch.”

* No joke. The KFC restaurant chain did ask Pope Benedict XVI to bless its new “Fish Snacker” product, which the company said would be “ideal for American Catholics who want to observe Lenten season traditions while still leading their busy, modern lifestyles.” Apparently, the pope declined.

* Try to imagine the media response if President George W. Bush ended a United Nations address with a call for the second coming of his Messiah and pledged to help this apocalypse happen sooner rather than later.

Would this make headlines? Thus, I was surprised when Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad drew little fire when he ended his fall U.N. speech by saying:

“I emphatically declare that today’s world … above all longs for the perfect righteous human being and the real savior who has been promised to all peoples and who will establish justice, peace and brotherhood on the planet. O, Almighty God, all men and women are your creatures and you have ordained their guidance and salvation. Bestow upon humanity that thirsts for justice, the perfect human being promised to all by you, and make us among his followers and among those who strive for his return.”

* Candid religion quote of the year? Asked by Vanity Fair if she is a Christian, columnist Ann Coulter replied: “Yes, sort of a mean Christian.”

* Church PR efforts are getting edgier. An Episcopal parish in New Jersey issued a “Message to Disaffected Roman Catholics” proclaiming that many “whose spiritual lives are grounded in the Mass and in the sacraments are, nevertheless, unable to concur with the Vatican’s position on issues such as the role of women in the church, contraception, remarriage of divorced person, homosexual relationships, or abortion. … If you are among them, you may find a comfortable spiritual home at Grace Church in Newark.”

* In a list of 100 men and women who are “transforming our world,” Time editors included 27 “artists and entertainers,” 16 “scientists and thinkers” and many other powerful people. However, the list included only three religious leaders. This is the planet earth we are talking about, right?

On his way home from a business call, he drove past the Greater Pleasant View Baptist Church in Brentwood, Tenn. As usual, the no-tech sign out front offered a folksy thought for the week. This one caught his eye.

“He who kneels before God can stand before anyone,” it said, in black, movable letters inserted by hand into slots on a plain white background.

Seitz pulled over and got out of his car to study the sign.

“It’s all about timing,” he said. “I’ve driven past thousands of church signs in my life, but this was the right sign on the right day. It got me. That’s the thing about these signs. They grab you when you least expect it. They move you, somehow.”

Before long, the president of Redbird Music crossed the line between intrigued and somewhat obsessed.

Along with his wife and their young son, he packed their car full of camera equipment and “lots of sippy cups” and hit the road. His goal was to find as many of these old-fashioned signs as possible — the kind that say things like “Coincidence is when God chooses to remain anonymous,” “Exercise daily, walk with the Lord,” “God answers knee mail” and “Give God what is right, not what is left.”

They spread their trips over three years and Seitz stopped keeping track of the miles after they passed the 20,000 mark. The result was “The Great American Book of Church Signs,” which contains 100 photographs taken in nearly 40 states. The pilgrimage, he said, was like reading “one long American sermon.”

Seitz did have questions. He wondered if these signs are still common at rural churches, but rarely used by city megachurches. Also, do some denominations embrace them, while others they are too simplistic? Would he find a red-church vs. blue-church pattern?

Many of his preconceptions were based on his experiences living and driving in the Bible Belt, especially two-lane roads in the Southeast.

“This book could have been done in Tennessee, alone. In fact, I think I could have done a whole book in Nashville,” said Seitz, laughing. “In this part of the world, you can throw a rock in just about any direction and hit four or five churches that have these signs. …

“Church signs are more common in some places than others, but if you keep looking you’ll find them at all kinds of churches all over the country.”

Thus, the Harmony Hill Church of God in Fayetteville, Tenn., proclaimed, “Faith is a journey, not a destination.” But Seitz also found a sign that said, “Love God with all of your heart, then do whatever you want” in front of the Fifth Avenue Presbyterian Church in New York, New York.

The Tompkinsville (Ken.) Church of Christ’s sign warned rural drivers that, “A dam holds water back. It’s not my last name. God.” On the other side of the doctrinal aisle, the sign at the South Church Unitarian Universalist sanctuary in Portsmouth, N.H., announced — with typically broad-minded sentiments — that, “True religion is the life we lead, not the creed we profess.”

Seitz said he was surprised that he saw very few signs that included political themes, although it was easy to read between the lines of one that said, “The Ten Commandments are still posted here.” It was

also easy to interpret another marquee that stressed, “God is not a Republican or a Democrat.”

This is not advanced theology. The message on a typical sign is only eight words long and is the product of a volunteer’s clever imagination, research in old church bulletins or, in the digital age, a quick search on the World Wide Web. Most combine a chuckle with a moral message that strives to appeal to strangers as well as members.

After all of his travels, Seitz decided that the archetypal church-sign message was this one: “Life is fragile. Handle with prayer.”

“It’s succinct, it has that little pun in there and it’s powerful, if you think about it for a minute,” he said. “That’s the essence of a good church sign message. That’s what you’re trying to do — get people to stop and think for a minute.”

“The 84-year-old John Paul was laid out in Clementine Hall, dressed in white and red vestments, his head covered with a white bishop’s miter and propped up on three dark gold pillows,” wrote Ian Fisher of the New York Times. “Tucked under his left arm was the silver staff, called the crow’s ear, that he had carried in public.”

Get the joke?

You see, that ornate silver shepherd’s crook is actually called a crosier (or “crozier”), not a “crow’s ear.”

This is the kind of error that believers love to cite as evidence that too many journalists don’t know which way is up when it comes to religion. Believe me, I receive more than my share of emails offering other examples. Did a BBC producer really write a subtitle saying that “Karma Light” nuns had gathered to mourn the pope?

Part of the problem is that religious people often speak in unknown tongues and it’s hard for journalists to tell what they’re saying. Thus, mistakes happen. It’s a bad thing to mess up the words when many of the words are sacred.

Sometimes, it helps to laugh.

Once a year, I mark this column’s anniversary — this is No. 18 — by collecting some of the strange words and events from the previous 12 months that just didn’t fit anywhere in particular. Obviously, I know that journalists make mistakes on the “God beat.” But, believe me, the folks in the pulpits and pews can get pretty strange, too.

* Pope John Paul II made headlines in 1986 when he visited a synagogue. Thus, a BBC writer said that the new Pope Benedict XVI’s “visit to the Cologne synagogue ? will mark only the second time in history that a head of the Catholic Church has entered a Jewish place of worship.” A reader sent me that item with this postscript: “Not counting the apostle Peter, obviously.”

* I thought this was a hoax. But it does appear that South Bronx Episcopalians have created a hip-hop Book of Common Prayer. Thus saith Bishop Catherine Roskam: “If Jesus were alive today, he would have been a rapper.”

I also love that the Episcopal Network for Animal Welfare is selling its own barbecue apron. Grill on.

* Anyone seeking information on the year’s hottest musical trend should visit www.hasidicreggae.com. Yes, you read that right.

* Back to Pope Benedict XVI. It seems that someone at the Associated Press needs to bone up on church history. A story from Vatican City on Nov. 27 began this way: “Pope Benedict XVI ushered in the Christmas season Sunday, calling it a time for joy when Christians should find it within themselves to hope that they can change the world.” Actually, the pope was marking the start of Advent, the penitential season that precedes Christmas. The 12-day Christmas season begins on Dec. 25.

* Speaking of the Christmas wars, a journalist sent me this rather understated headline from Miami Beach: “Blindfolded Santa Hanging From Noose At Home Upsets Neighborhood.” I can understand that. What I cannot understand is why some schools allow students to sing “Feliz Navidad (happy Christmas),” but not “White Christmas” and other songs that contain the C-word.

* You knew this was coming. The truly devoted can now buy an “iBelieve” device that clicks on to the top of an Apple iPod Shuffle and turns it — yes — into a large white cross that can be worn around the neck.

I believe that has a bit more class than those gym shorts with the words “Left Behind” printed, well, you can imagine where.

* The publication of 12 caricatures of the Prophet Mohammad upset many readers. However, other readers were just as upset when newspapers declined to publish them, with editors saying — to a chorus of snickers in many pews — that they did not want to offend religious believers.

Thus, one Bob Flavell wrote to the Boston Globe and said: “I find all of your editorial cartoons deeply offensive, morally, religiously, philosophically and spiritually. In fact, I don’t like your editorials, either. And the editorializing in your news coverage is annoying as well. In keeping with your cowardly policy not to offend anyone, kindly cease publication at once.”

Eric Metaxas thinks that anyone who truly wants to understand the righteous and jealous God of the Bible should try meditating on a different image. Metaxas is thinking about Motown, rather than Vatican City.

“I admit that the Bible does not specifically mention Aretha Franklin,” said Metaxas, a humor writer and speaker best known for his work with the Manhattan-based “Socrates in the City” lecture series. “But when it comes to thinking about God, most people’s minds are full of all those familiar images and they just get stuck. … So why not Aretha? She’s big, she’s bold and you’re going to have to listen to what she’s saying.”

And everybody knows what the Queen of Soul is going to say: “What you want, baby I got it. What you need, do you know I got it? All I’m askin’ is for a little respect when you come home (just a little bit). ? R-E-S-P-E-C-T, find out what it means to me.”

Hold on to that image for a minute, because there is a method to his madness and it’s at the heart of his quirky book “Everything You Always Wanted to Know About God (but were afraid to ask).” Metaxas is a friend of mine and the best way I can explain where he’s coming from is to say that he’s a former editor of The Record at Yale University, America’s oldest college humor magazine, and he’s written for thinkers as diverse as Chuck Colson of Watergate fame and Bob the Tomato of VeggieTales.

The key is that Metaxas (www.ericmetaxas.com) thinks humor is serious stuff and that most religious leaders haven’t grasped this basic fact about modern life. He is convinced that Americans are not going to listen if theologians and clergy keep offering dense doctrinal arguments when making a case for a traditional faith. Instead of talking about how many angels can dance on a copy of the Summa Theologiae, modern missionaries and apologists need to consider the strategies they would use to talk to Comedy Central fans over a few beers and a bowl of mixed nuts.

Which brings us back to Aretha Franklin.

Many modern seekers, said Metaxas, are curious about God and they wish they could find some answers to their tough spiritual questions. But, at the same time, they have trouble accepting the traditional Christian belief that God is God and that there is only one way to find salvation. These claims sound petty and intolerant.

“Here’s a comparison that might make sense,” argues Metaxas, in a book chapter entitled “How Can Anyone Take the Bible Seriously?”

“If a guy is married and he tries to persuade his wife that he needs to have a few other women on the side, his wife will likely say, ‘Sorry, Romeo, but that’s not going to fly. If you want to be married to me, you have to forego those other women. Period.’ It’s just like that with God. He doesn’t force us to pick him, but he does force us to choose between him and the others. We can’t have both.”

In other words, God demands R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

Metaxas has other skewed takes on big issues. He thinks that using sex for self-gratification makes as much sense as using Rembrandt paintings to line birdcages. He’s interested in life’s big questions, questions like how the universe — including all those Chevy Camaros in Queens and Staten Island — exploded out of something smaller than the period at the end of a sentence.

Is this theology? No, it isn’t the way that intellectuals talk in cathedral pulpits and faculty clubs, said Metaxas. But it is the way that ordinary people talk on Friday nights while hanging out with their friends.

“At some point Christians are going to have to use humor and parody because that’s the language of the culture,” he said. “That’s what people consider sharp and entertaining and real. ? You can keep serving up tea-and-crumpets moralism and logical arguments and it’s not going to matter because people aren’t going to listen.

“You may as well be speaking Ukrainian. That isn’t going to work, unless you happen to be speaking to Ukrainians.”

Mel Gibson’s hit is “deeply sadistic” and “militaristic,” said history professor Robert Orsi, during a panel discussion.

“Pornographic,” added New Testament scholar Ellen Aitken, speaking with what a press release called “biting contempt.” The always outspoken Harvey Cox called it a “celebration of apocalyptic violence.” Make that “obscene” and “blasphemous,” according to writer James Carroll.

The room was packed but, apparently, there were no dissenting viewpoints. Which is interesting, if you think about it. I have found legions of intelligent, articulate people whose views of Gibson’s work are all over the map, from ecstatic praise to incisive damnation.

Perhaps it’s hard to find such diversity at Harvard. Perhaps there were some people present who liked the film — even parts of it — but didn’t feel free to speak. It might have taken courage to speak up in such a “tolerant” setting.

Which is quite sad, I think. Every year, I mark this column’s anniversary — this is No. 16 — by sharing some of the year’s offbeat anecdotes that didn’t fit into any particular column. If I have learned anything on the religion beat it is that sometimes you have to let people say what they really want to say and then just quote them saying it.

This gets wild, when people start opening up on matters of faith.

Trust me. Here are some recent examples.

* Speaking of the Passion phenomenon, the Glassport (Pa.) Assembly of God caused a stir with its civic Easter program that included the mock scourging of a youth minister in a bunny suit. The goal was to show that Easter is not about a bunny, but the suffering, death and resurrection of Jesus. The Associated Press reported that some viewers were confused. Melissa Salzmann said her 4-year-old son J.T. was “crying and asking me why the bunny was being whipped.”

Clearly, the AP showed restraint. Obvious questions remained. Was the bunny in chains? And with what was the wabbit whipped?

* Yes, it’s a cheap shot. Addressing the election of gay Bishop Gene Robinson, the Los Angeles Times opined: “The actions taken by the New Hampshire Episcopalians are an affront to Christians everywhere. I am just thankful that the church’s founder, Henry VIII, and his wife Catherine of Aragon, his wife Anne Boleyn, his wife Jane Seymour, his wife Anne of Cleves, his wife Katherine Howard and his wife Catherine Parr are no longer here to suffer through this assault on our traditional Christian marriage.”

What’s next on that story? Keep in mind these words from Karl Marx: “The English established church will more readily pardon an attack on 38 of its 39 Articles (of Religion) than on 1/39th of its income.”

* Speaking of the Los Angeles Times, critic Mark Swed called the opera “Die Frau Ohne Schatten” a “glorious and goofy pro-life paean.” But some someone changed “pro-life” to “anti-abortion,” which would have been a different opera. Or did the editing software do that?

* The British edition of Cosmopolitan has decided there may be more to life than sex and credit cards. The magazine’s new “spirituality editor,” Hannah Borno, wrote: “I’ve come to the painful realization that men and shoes are not enough to make me happy. The key to true contentment lies elsewhere.”

But not in a pew, she said. “We’re looking at spirituality rather than organized religion, because that’s where there seems to be a demand from our readers. They want something a bit more alternative.”

*A reader sent this: Gilligan equals sloth and the skipper represents anger. Then Thurston Howell III equals greed, Lovey Howell is gluttony, Ginger is lust, the professor is pride and, finally, Mary Ann represents envy. Who knew?

* The interfaith scribes at Beliefnet.com asked religious leaders to complete this statement: “If I were God for a day I would…” Phil “Bob the Tomato” Vischer of the VeggieTales offered this: “I would, with the noblest of intentions, make a monumental mess. Having seen the sort of messes I can create in my personal and professional life with my tiny little powers, I can only imagine what horrific catastrophe I could engineer with omnipotence. I’ll leave God right where he is, thank you.”